Update 18

 Well, feel it is time for a general gaming update. The last two posts were more general sorts of musings. So I want to write something a bit more directly gaming related.

I have been to the go club three times now. I seem to have fallen naturally into an every other week pattern. This last Sunday I met someone who had been at IUB shortly before I had. I am a bit unclear if our time there overlapped or not. At that time there were two go clubs. One met in the student union on Friday nights. That club was essentially these two old guys Don and Paul who played each other every week and discussed local politics plus whoever else showed up. Unfortunately, I guess the guy I met this last Sunday had a bit of a negative experience with them in that he felt they were unwilling to play him. So he started another club just down the street at the Asian Culture Center. I remember that at one time I was going to that club because I have memories of hanging out with the Korean guy who manned the desk there. But I don't remember much about that club. I do have distinct memories of a small tournament at that club. I believe it was a knockout and there were about 10 people or so. I seem to remember that I got a bit lucky because the two strongest players got paired in an early round so I ended up playing the winner in the final so I was able to get second place. Most of my memories of go in Bloomington though have to do with the Friday night club. I certainly didn't feel that Don and Paul were unwilling to play me although they definitely felt that the main item of business was playing each other I guess. Anyways, it was an interesting stroll down memory lane. Anyways, this fellow gave me four stones and whipped me. So I guess that is a happy thing because I am in the middle of the ladder at this club so there are stronger players to aim for and weaker players to help. I also played a couple of games with Jackie and I feel I might have been a bit hard on him. He wanted to play even the first time so we did but he resigned. And then we played on four stones and again he resigned because I was way ahead. I know it can be tough to be on the receiving end of that. I tried to find some teaching moments to give him some knowledge but unsure how helpful I was. Hopefully we can play more.

 I have continued to play over pro games. I can't remember whether I posted about this or not but I finished playing over all the supplemental games in Invincible and have made some good progress going through the John Fairbairn book about the games of Shuei. I have enjoyed it as usual with his books. It is still this thing that in some ways playing over these games is comforting for me and can help to settle my nerves or make me feel better. But basically I am playing over them fairly rapidly although stopping to read the comments. So sometimes I feel a bit blah about it in the sense that it is not really deep study. I am for the most part not calculating variations or really considering alternate moves. I suppose you could say this is lazy but I just feel in some ways I would likely just get bogged down if I tried to analyze the games. And like I said, I do it partly as a comfort thing. That being said, I have read in several different places that playing over pro games without analyzing, just playing over the games fairly quickly, is good for your go. I do feel I have internalized some things from this practice. So at the end of the day it suits me to do it this way so I will continue.

Other than that I haven't really been taking go too seriously. I have been doing a few problems in a couple of apps on my phone but that has been kind of a mixed bag. I have been solving some but also sometimes just guessing which I feel strongly is the wrong way to approach problems. I feel that is the problem with doing problems on the computer or phone. The temptation is much stronger to just click and see what happens. When doing problems in a book, I find it much easier to be disciplined. But books also have issues. One is the question of where the answers are placed. Because in some of my books they are placed on the back side of the page with the problem but the paper is too thin so the answer shows through. This has been a major problem with a series of books by Lee Chang Ho (or at least with his name and picture on them). The problems are great problems and there are a lot of them. But the books are just too inconvenient to use because of this issue. For other books sometimes the answers are printed all together at the back of the book, but then it is inconvenient to look at the answers particularly because you want to avoid seeing the answers to other problems. So that can require negotiation. And even if the paper is thick enough for the answers to be on the next page, if you do nine problems per page it is still necessary to somehow record your answers to prevent forgetting whether you actually got the right answer or not and there is not really a convenient way to do that for go problems.

On the role-playing front, the Nerd Louisville session is tomorrow night. So I am looking forward to that. On my own, I have been exploring the original Delta Green book as well as Call of Cthulu 7th edition. I also got a copy of the Basic Roleplaying system because of my interest in universal systems like GURPS. I decided to dip my toe into having Claude (the AI program) run a solo Delta Green adventure for me. I was able to use the Call of Cthulu book to make a character but right now it just exists in the chat with Claude. I intend to fill out a character sheet that I printed off the other day and then I will try to take a photo and post that. I was really resistant to using AI for solo play but somehow I guess I just kind of came around on it. I can't really point to a major shift in my beliefs or anything. I guess I just wanted to see how well it could do it.

Other than that I haven't really been doing a whole lot on the games front. I have been reading an anthology of short stories called "The Weird" edited by Ann and Jeff VanderMeer. I am liking that a lot and I consider it background material for some of the role-playing stuff so it is "games-adjacent". But other than that not much. I brought a chess board and some chess books with me (most of my stuff is being shipped from Taiwan and won't arrive for awhile yet) and I have done some research about local chess clubs but for some reason haven't felt motivated to really pursue that. I also have kind of blown off Magic. I had planned to go to the Secrets of Strixhaven prerelease but I just didn't really feel like it when it was the day of. I have watched some Nick Button videos but haven't been playing either online or in person. I also brought my steam deck with me but just haven't really felt motivated to play video games, although sometimes I wish I had my desktop PC set up so I could play Age of Wonders 4. I did buy a book at Surface Noise detailing many different solitaire games played with regular playing cards but I have yet to actually try any of them.

So, overall gaming is continuing but for the most part it seems to be more of a simmer than a roiling boil. 

Creating Good or Value

 Today I got kind of excited about the idea of getting competitive about creating Good or Value. I was thinking about how in life it is really pretty open about how you create Good or Value and everybody does it in different ways. But I was also thinking that there are some principles. So I was sort of interested in some principles for this generalized notion of value. One thing I have kind of thought about a fair bit is that it seems like Good or Value comes about through coherence. What I mean is that you create Good or Value by making choices that add up. That goes for writing a novel or poem or whatever as well as in games where you create value in your position by making choices with your moves. But of course it also goes in life where we make value by making coherent choices over the course of time.

Then I was thinking that in a lot of ways the notion of value ultimately has to do with other people. At the end of the day, the notion of value I had was generating happiness for other people. That could be in a variety of ways. For some people it is just in terms of in the world immediately around them with the people that they encounter on a daily basis. For other people they generate value for other people by creating or performing. Unfortunately, there are people who create a great deal of value for people they don't know through art or performances or activities at a high level but who create a lot of suffering for the people around them in their daily lives. Even if you imagine yourself as a servant of a higher power, that work is done in the context of generating value for other people...

However, as an introvert, I feel there is a lot of value in maintaining my inner world in a healthy and harmonious way. But I kind of realize that at the end of the day, the real measure of that is how my practice of maintaining my inner organization benefits others in my interactions with them.

 But then I came back to the idea of competition. My whole life I have been attracted to competition and excellence, even though I have never really excelled at any of the competitive activities that I have engaged in. So part of me would really like to combine the idea of competition with the idea of generating value. But in some ways there seems to be a bit of a contradiction because competition easily slides into egoism and selfishness. So the trick is to somehow find a way of channeling competition into good for other people. One of the things I have thought about along these lines is the notion that by offering people good competition you encourage them to improve themselves. So in the sense that by being good yourself, you present a challenge to others to improve themselves.

But it seems to me there is some way that you can compete to create value, in the sense of like a subtle competition to generate happiness in the people around you. But I want to be clear that what I have in mind is different from people pleasing or pandering. And that is why it is subtle. The idea is not to curry favor with people but through your interaction with them to generate true good. To influence them for the good. Not in a manipulative way but in the sense of trying to generate true happiness for them. Sometimes this could involve resisting them somehow or rather resisting their negative impulses.

Then somehow I took a left turn and started to think about the idea of subtlety. That somehow there is something valuable about subtlety. But I always feel kind of conflicted about that because sometimes subtlety seems kind of exclusionary. But there seems to be something at some level where subtlety is beneficial in a way. But that is something I need to think about more

But then I was combining that with the idea of resistance and the idea of resistance was to value capture in many ways. Value capture is the notion that you try to measure and quantify value in a way that ultimately destroys true value and substitutes the measurement. This idea is from C. Thi Nguyen. So somehow the idea is to resist this value capture process.

And that brought me back to something I have been thinking a lot about lately and that is the notion of the weird. I mean this is in sort of like the whole Weird Tales kind of horror sort of mentality but also in the whole "Keep Austin Weird" kind of mentality. That somehow weirdness is a way of resisting value capture. And like how weirdness has both a horror dimension and like a beauty dimension.

So, for me in some ways I would like this blog to be a way of creating value for other people. Value that somehow comes out of my own inner weirdness. 

 

 

 

Adjusting the sliders

 One thing I feel I am getting more comfortable with in life is the idea of balance. I have a personality that runs to extremes and that often wants to make really definite decisions that have a clear directive behind them. But that pattern usually sets me up for failure, and somehow that failure feeds the cycle so I feel I have to make an even more definite and extremely forceful decision about how to be... ad nauseum...

 So basically I have kind of gradually gotten somewhat more comfortable with the idea that a lot of things in my life are not bad. In fact they are good. But, my tendency is to take them too far and then over-react to that fact and want to go to extremes.

So, I think there are just various dimensions of my life. Which is a good thing. So I feel I am starting to get a more definite handle on the fact that like a lot of things in life are more like sliders than they are like toggle switches. So one example is buying games stuff. Che Webster over on roleplay rescue blog had a post (that I can't seem to find right now) talking about this with respect to playing vs buying rpg books. Buying games stuff is good. It is a definite action that can support both publishers and games stores. And it is fun to collect. But there is definitely a sense in my own life where sometimes the buying stuff takes over and actual reading the books or playing the games or whatever takes the back burner. So, a lot of times when I realize that, I have this desire to over react and say I will never spend another penny on games until I have absolutely gotten max value out of each and every item I own. So, I think that never works and just sort of causes me to establish these rigid parameters that I inevitably fail at following. So the solution is just to adjust the slider instead. Not to beat myself up for spending money but also recognizing that there is a pattern of overspending. So just to try to nudge the slider back into the direction of other kinds of activities...  

Another aspect that I need to work on is the time alone vs time with others slider. I am an introvert. So I enjoy spending time alone. But there is also a sense in which I use that as a justification for not doing things that would be both pleasurable and good for me. That is because they would be outside of my comfort zone. So the solution is not to force myself to go to every single club and activity regardless of how I feel. But at the same time pushing out from my comfort zone is a must because there is a definite sense that when I allow it to the general pull of my personality is to slide into just staying home endlessly and letting my world get really small. So, I just feel this is tricky because it is hard to identify sometimes when the choice is avoidance and when it is self-care.

My new life back in US seems to have a lot of these sorts of issues kind of cropping up. And now that I am on my own, I am having to make decisions about this stuff on my own. So, I think there are some things coming about like "trusting myself" and like "being gentle with myself". It is necessary to recognize that I have very limited experience living on my own so I am bound to go a little overboard in some directions and need to correct course. The trick is to not beat myself up but rather to just recognize when an adjustment is needed and then to just do my best to do it without all the extremes of setting rigid rules for myself and stuff like that. 

The President of the Nerds

Well, I can safely say I met the president of the nerds! On Tuesday I went to Golden Keep Games a local game shop and met two cool people. One was the clerk at the shop who was quite nice and helpful and the other was the president of a local non-profit called Nerd Louisville. The objective of this non-profit is to promote gaming. So it was a very nice experience. I was a little hesitant to make the trip there because it was about an hour long trip by bus and I thought the shop might be disappointing. But overall it was a great experience and I really got to talk to these two people for good long while because it was early afternoon on a weekday and we were the only ones in the shop. Mostly Nelson and Tom were trading stories but we also talked about Austin, Texas where Nelson has spent some time. I got to ask some questions. Unfortunately the Delta Green game I was interested in has been discontinued but I got introduced to the Nerd Louisville website through a card. They run an event called slur your roll which is a set of roleplaying sessions that take place on the second and fourth sundays of each month. They take place at a bar but hopefully there will be no problem with just ordering a coke. The price of a ticket is $8 which seems reasonable although it could add up if I decide I like playing there. So I signed up for a session playing the game Mothership on the 26th. Overall it was a big success in terms of getting connected with the community.

Brief Review: Seven Games

 Recently, I checked out the book Seven Games by Oliver Roeder from the library and read it. In some ways I don't have a lot to say about it so this will be a brief review. Overall I liked the book. As its name suggests it is composed of seven chapters about seven different games. The writing is a mix of stuff. Some of it is about the history of the games, some of it is personal anecdotes, some of it is quotes from interviews with people involved in those games. Roeder is a journalist by trade and the chapters definitely read like magazine pieces. They are mostly pitched at a level to explain things to people who may not be familiar with the games or at least the more serious competitive levels of the games. The main emphasis of most of the chapters though is on the development of strong computer programs that can play the games. I did enjoy reading the book although there wasn't a whole lot that was new to me. I am also more interested in the culture of the games rather than the development of computer programs. I will say that it was interesting to read that bridge is so far is one of the games that doesn't have a strong computer program but Roeder definitely implied that this has a lot to do with bridge being a dying game in the sense of young people aren't picking it up. So overall I would recommend reading this if you like fairly light reading about the advent of strong programs in a variety of games. Roeder definitely seems to be knowledgeable and a real gamer himself.

Go club

 Well, I arrived back in the US about a week and half ago. Things have been a bit bumpy getting re-established but not altogether bad. But the good news is that Louisville has a go club and I got to visit yesterday. It is pretty small. There were just 5 of us. Michael who is the leader of the club is a good bit stronger than me. We played twice, the first time on four stones and I resigned, the second on six stones and I won by about 40 points.

The other three players are good bit weaker. Michael said I could give them 9 stones. I played one game on 9 stones with Tommy. He played well but I was able to kill a group and he resigned.

Overall everyone seemed quite nice and the coffee shop is a pleasant environment. There were also a couple of chess players playing but that was unconnected with the go club. But I did get to chat with them a bit and told them about playing at the St. Louis chess club.

I think that is something I missed while I was in Taiwan. In Bloomington there was also a small club but in a way that was even smaller. There were really just two regular members Don and Paul. They had been playing each other every Friday night for years. I played with them a good bit and there were other people that would come sometimes. But it was pleasant. Obviously go (wei qi) is much bigger in Taiwan, and people were friendly but at the same time there was just a cultural gap. Also a lot of the people that play at clubs like that are quite a bit stronger than me. So basically it was really nice to be at a club where I felt like I could chat with people a bit more easily. It was also really nice be able to do some teaching. Tommy seemed to understand some stuff about the game but he seemed to avoid ko fights... so I was able to walk him through the process of his first real ko fight and that was really cool. It felt good that I was able to pass on some skills. People here obviously also knew about Hikaru no Go and we were able to talk about that as well. So it just felt like a nice pleasant place to play.

On the home front I finished playing through the supplemental games in Invincible, so I can chalk that up as a 100%. I started in on the games of Shuei by Fairbairn. I have still been watching some Nick Button videos and have been continuing my daily games. The Chess Dojo open classical tournament ended on a whimper rather than a bang because the week I actually came to the US obviously wasn't good and I agreed an unplayed draw with my oppo. The next week it looked like I would be able to play the last game of the tourney but my oppo cancelled at the last moment. So, oh well. I will continue to explore the gaming scene here in Louisville and will try to report on it as I go.

Update 17

 Been kind of quiet on the blog front. Part of that has been some major upheaval in my personal life and part of it has been some uncertainty about what direction I am going in or what I would like to write about.

The biggest news is that I am returning to the US. Hopefully this will mean more in person events for the big three of chess, go, and magic, but also for other types of games. I am also interested in pursuing some kind of career in the games industry. One line is to do a masters with C Thi Nguyen at the University of Utah in the philosophy of games. I have a BA in philosophy and he seems to be doing a style of philosophy of games that I can relate to. I was aware of him before and had a copy of his previous book but my wife passed me a link to a podcast where he was the guest talking about his new book. Here it is! I really like a lot of the things he had to say. I really have no idea how realistic an idea it is to get admitted there for that purpose but it is something I want to investigate.

Following the intuition about chess being important I rejoined the dojo and got into an open classical tournament. This is a tournament where you arrange to meet your opponent at a specific time online and play a slow game. I won my first game but have been on a losing streak since then. Did a couple of reviews for games I had played but then kind of got lazy. I made significant progress rereading Chernev’s Logical Chess but other than that haven’t been doing a whole lot of work on my chess.

Still playing over go games trying to finish the supplemental games in Invincible but the pace has definitely been much slacker than it was a few months ago. 

Still playing my daily games of chess and go and have avoided timeouts.

My interest in Magic has been picking up again after a lull. Mostly this has expressed itself in terms of watching Nick Button videos on youtube. Nick plays best of three pioneer which is a format that I feel pretty drawn to now that I have been playing Magic long enough that a lot of my cards have rotated out of standard. But I did try brewing up a mono-blue tempo deck based on a standard deck I had played before and liked but the experiment didn’t work out all that well. Other than that this weekend I played a pre-release event at Growlife. I wasn’t super interested in this set but I kind of just wanted to play one more event there before leaving Taiwan. We played in a new space that the owner has rented a couple of blocks away from the main store. It was quite nice. I had a good conversation with someone who has been a significant part of my experience of Magic here who is also moving back to the US soon. But in terms of the gameplay, time management was a big issue. When I first started playing these sealed prereleases I tended to try to read more of my cards and really try to settle on some kind of strategy. However this often resulted in me rushing to finish my deck at the end of the time limit and sometimes delaying the start of the first match. The result is that I have overcorrected and I finished building my deck this time well before the time limit was up but this was because I didn’t put much thought into it. I looked at the rares I had pulled. Decided I liked the blue and geen ones the best, so I just jammed all the creatures I had in those colors and picked a few spells to round out the deck and just said ok. The result was that I went 1-2. And I feel like the victory was kind of lucky because it was against a really good player and he kind of had trouble with his draws and I got lucky with some of mine. Don’t get me wrong, it felt great to beat him, but I am not reading too much into it. Against the other two players my deck looked quite weak. But I guess that is one thing I am kind of hoping about moving back to the US. It seems the people playing these events in Taiwan are pretty good. Part of me is hoping that when I play in the US there will be more of a range of player skill levels so I am not always at the bottom.